You are already done reading if you still accept, ten years into 9/11, that an Ali Baba from his perch in the Hindukush mountains can so trivially reduce the sole superpower into international barbarianism and domestic police-state, all with his magic carpet. Please spend the rest of your life chasing your ‘American Dreams’. You might perhaps also prefer to be here instead of studying with Project Humanbeingsfirst.org – until it’s time to welcome the next Super Ali Baba++ when you shall once again have the great pleasure to ‘United We Stand’ with your president, or, run frantically like the “9/11 Truth Movement” crowd trying to out do each other in what is “truth” after the fact, ex post facto, once matters are already fait accompli and world government is fully in place! The 9/11 “Truth Seekers” are still at it ten years into 9/11 (The Toronto Hearings) for what was already obvious on day one, instead of focussing on what is not yet a fait accompli to prevent it from ever becoming one!
However, if your mind is unable to accept that an Ali Baba on a flying carpet possessed of no matter what magical powers, can so easily reduce the sole superpower to the status of a vanilla third world dictatorship steeped in Orwellian NewSpeak, and you want to do something to prevent the next Super Ali Baba++ from cementing your existence in a total prison-state, please read on.
The first thing you must understand, before you can understand anything, is the role of absurdities and fait accompli in political science:
Well, finally I can say welcome, bienvenue, welcome, to the RealitySpeak of ‘Imperial Mobilization’! — Now read on
What’s Next after Osama Bin Laden | The Next Global Threat Prediction | 9/11 Revisited 10th Year | 9/11 and Imperial Mobilization | What is War on Terror | Un-Hidden Agenda for World Government
What’s next after Osama Bin Laden?
Zahir Ebrahim: First we had Ali Baba attacking America from its magnificent flying machine
President Obama Warns Not To Challenge Official 9/11 Story:
Project Humanbeingsfirst’s Prediction: Alien Invasion – The Next Global Threat
National Geographic Channel Show Ponders The Possibility of an Alien Attack
“It should be as statistical as human nature, for example, that there’s going to be good guys and bad guys,” says Dr. Travis Taylor, who’s with the U.S. Space and Missile Command Department and has worked with the Department of Defense and NASA for 20 years.
“What we would hope is that the good guys show up first, and that would be really nice. But the point of this wasn’t to debate whether they are or they aren’t, it’s what happens if they did. Do we have a plan? What type of plan should we put together, and how would we defend the planet?” Taylor has also written the handbook for harrying aliens, An Introduction to Planetary Defense.
Lt. Col. Brian De Toy, director of defense and strategic studies program at West Point, doesn’t buy the premise. “I am a skeptical believer in miracles. So a year ago right now I was in Iraq, and I’m more worried about Iraq and Afghanistan right now and the aliens that I’m dealing with there. And so right now, I’m pretty skeptical about the others.”’— National Geographic via Boston Herald May 17, 2011
“If suddenly there was a threat to this world from some other species from another planet,” President Ronald Reagan had read out loud from his script at the United Nations General Assembly podium in 1987, “in our obsession with antagonisms of the moment, we often forget how much unites all the members of humanity. Perhaps we need some outside universal threat to make us recognize this common bond. I occasionally think how quickly our differences worldwide would vanish, if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world!” — President Ronald Reagan, Speaking at the UN General Assembly, September 21, 1987
Fabricating a public discourse on an absurd fantasy as if it’s something real by couching it in the veneer of science (or declassified State-Secrets/whistleblowing) and then reacting to that invention at supra-national levels from the United Nations to the Catholic Church, only legitimizes such discourse thus setting the stage for the later creation of a new insurmountable global threat, the Clash of Planets. If political scientists are to be believed on the utility of diabolical protocols for “imperial mobilization”, then, “that exercise requires a high degree of doctrinal motivation, intellectual commitment, and patriotic gratification.” Its doctrinal seeds must be planted years in advance. This too will surely also be launched with “either you are with us, or with the aliens”! — The Agenda Behind Aliens and UFOs.
The rulers can “United We Stand” the masses upon any absurdity, if they can get them to believe it. This is Machiavelli 101: ‘Convince People of Absurdities and get them Acquiescing to Atrocities: The Enduring Power of Machiavellian Political Science!’ — Wikileaks and the UFO.
The Alien-UFO Agenda is one such future fait accompli in the works which can still be averted by the public becoming rationally informed about the demonic art of the Mighty Wurlitzer. The fact that references to UFOs even made it into one of Wikileaks whistleblowing disclosures; the fact that the FBI recently made available a 1950 Roswell UFO memo lending “UFOs” a legitimacy in the gullible mind by way of it being held as a supposed “state-secret” for these past sixty years; and the uptick in bogus conversations on Aliens and UFO sightings even appearing in the mainstream press not to mention its unrelenting repetition in the so called “alternate media” and on the internet; all indicate that its unveiling time is likely approaching near. This too will surely also be launched with “either you are with us, or with the aliens” false dialectics! — A Note on the Mighty Wurlitzer – Anatomy of Modern Propaganda Techniques.
Using State-Secrets For Myth Fabrication
Caption ‘Proof of (alien) life? A copy of the 1950 memo that recounts the discovery of flying saucers and aliens in New Mexico. The memo has been published on the FBI website’ — UK Daily Mail 9th April 2011.
‘Aliens might have souls and could choose to be baptised if humans ever met them, a Vatican scientist said today. The official also dismissed intelligent design as “bad theology” that had been “hijacked” by American creationist fundamentalists.
Guy Consolmagno, who is one of the pope’s astronomers, said he would be “delighted” if intelligent life was found among the stars. “But the odds of us finding it, of it being intelligent and us being able to communicate with it – when you add them up it’s probably not a practical question.”
Speaking ahead of a talk at the British Science Festival in Birmingham tomorrow, he said that the traditional definition of a soul was to have intelligence, free will, freedom to love and freedom to make decisions. “Any entity – no matter how many tentacles it has – has a soul.” Would he baptise an alien? “Only if they asked.”’ — UK Guardian 17 Sep 2010
UN ‘to appoint space ambassador to greet alien visitors’
‘Mazlan Othman, a Malaysian astrophysicist, is set to be tasked with co-ordinating humanity’s response if and when extraterrestrials make contact.
Aliens who landed on earth and asked: “Take me to your leader” would be directed to Mrs Othman.
The 58-year-old is expected to tell delegates that the proposal has been prompted by the recent discovery of hundreds of planets orbiting other starts, which is thought to make the discovery of extraterrestrial life more probable than ever before. Mrs Othman is currently head of the UN’s little known Office for Outer Space Affairs (Unoosa).
In a recent talk to fellow scientists, she said: “The continued search for extraterrestrial communication, by several entities, sustains the hope that some day human kind will received signals from extraterrestrials.
“When we do, we should have in place a coordinated response that takes into account all the sensitivities related to the subject. The UN is a ready-made mechanism for such coordination.”
Opinion is divided about how future extraterrestrial visitors should be greeted. Under the Outer Space Treaty on 1967, which Unoosa oversees, UN members agreed to protect Earth against contamination by alien species by “sterilising” them.
Professor Stephen Hawking has warned that alien interlopers should be treated with caution.
He said: “I imagine they might exist in massive ships, having used up all the resources from their home planet. The outcome for us would be much as when Christopher Columbus first landed in America, which didn’t turn out very well for the Native Americans.”’ — UK Telegraph 26 Sep 2010
9/11 Revisited: 10th Year! Some American Voices
Zahir Ebrahim: WTC Towers Were The Victim of Someone’s Terrorism – Obviously – BUT HOW?
(Warning: See Project Humanbeingsfirst’s No-Affiliation-Notice first)
Zahir Ebrahim’s Open Letter to 9/11 Truth Chiefs April 30, 2011
Zahir Ebrahim’s Comment on Judy Wood’s ‘The New Hiroshima’
Why is Judy Wood poisoning her own well? The New Hiroshima Part-3 By Zahir Ebrahim
Letter on why I no longer trust Steven Jones et. al.’s 9/11 narratives: revisiting 9/11 as a techie
Caption Professor Steven Jones of BYU (standing second from left) officially appointed in 1989 by the President of the United States, George H.W. Bush Sr., as an establishmentarian scientist to lead the DOE investigation into the potentially revolutionizing discovery of Cold Fusion. Can a George Bush Sr.’s trusted establishmentarian scientist suddenly become a genuine dissenting scientist against the same establishment in George Bush Jr.’s administration as anything other than controlled opposition?
Zahir Ebrahim’s October 2009 Letter to Editor – Journal of 911 Studies: The pursuit of 911 truth
Zahir Ebrahim: 911 A Fait Accompli – Pay Attention to Political Science! April 13, 2009
Zahir Ebrahim: Reflections on Science in the Service of Empire November 30, 2009
—————————
Did Osama Bin Laden & Al Qaeda do it – like the American Presidents continually assert?
Core Of Corruption Volume 1: In The Shadows
War by Deception 2011 The shadow government and shadow economy
—————————
BBC now admits al qaeda never existed
The Corbett Report presents: al qaeda doesn’t exist
BBC: Hijack ‘suspects’ alive and well 23 September, 2001
It Wasn’t Arabs – Essay by Edgar J. Steele Nov 18 2003
Muslims didn’t do 9-11 – Why won’t the world say it?
—————————
—————————
Zahir Ebrahim: What can be done?
See caveat in Zahir Ebrahim’s Letter: Understanding the ‘arc of crisis’ with minimal work
Source URL: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2011/05/911-revisited-10th-year-some-american.html
Mirror URL: http://humanbeingsfirst.wordpress.com/2011/03/09/911-revisited-10th-year-some-american-voices/
Further Study URL: http://humanbeingsfirst.wordpress.com/hot/
911 and Imperial Mobilization Redux By Zahir Ebrahim
Prisoners of the Cave – Deception Point 911 And Its Greatest Democratic Enablers
.“911 is is a point of departure for me … I see the deliberate hands of the American-Israeli intelligence agencies and/or “Second Foundationers” from deep within the American ruling elite in orchestrating this New Pearl Harbor. For a country that can sense what is deep within the bowels of the Earth and in the farthest reaches of the heavens, that seeks “full spectrum dominance” of air, land, sea, space, cyberspace, et. al. in its own military doctrines, and that publicly warns in its strategy documents that the only way for it to embark on this “imperial mobilization” is an increased military budget that can only come about in a “new pearl harbor”, 9-11 has only one reality – self-inflicted. — Chapter 2: Don’t Ever Ask “Why is it possible to hate America” Prisoners of the Cave
.“I am betting that when knowledge of the crime of the emperor comes to them, and their complicity in it is realized by them, that like Lady Macbeth, the American public will be torn by their good conscience, that they will be as unable to remain “innocent of knowledge” as Lady Macbeth, and will endeavor to right the wrongs done in their name by their successive governments. As Arundhati Roy put it in a speech: “Yours is by no means a great nation – but you could be a great people – history is giving you the chance – seize the time.” I am betting that the conscience of its own people will prove to be the real fifth column in the United States of America. Perhaps somewhat idealistic, but it is precisely ideals that seem to be lacking in the collective wisdom of this nation, where mostly everything is viewed from the distorted prism of the pragmatic, the expeditious, the instantly gratifying, and the “might makes right” imperial sight. Its injection into the American polity cannot be a bad thing. I don’t expect everyone to necessarily agree with my work, the point of it being not to make you agree with me, but to motivate you into examining your invisible chains in the hope that if you earnestly look for them, you will likely find them. — Postscript Prisoners of the Cave
The world pleads: “God save us from American peace and liberty”
.“This irrational behavior is only possible because we, the citizens of the nation, permit it. It is no longer a question of controlling a military-industrial complex, but rather, of keeping the United States from becoming a totally military culture. — The United States: A militarized society, Jerome B. Wiesner, president emeritus MIT, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Aug 1985, pg. 104
And just as his predecessors did, President OBAMA too reiterates who the enemy is, even threatening the public to not question America’s official sacred story of who the enemy is, and cleverly lumping “questioning 9/11” with “justifying 9/11”
.“I am aware that there is still some who would question, or even justify the offense of 911.
But let us be clear. Al Qaeeda killed nearly 3000 people on that day. The victims were innocent men, women, and children from America and many other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody.
And yet Al Qaeeda chose to ruthlessly murder these people, claimed credit for the attack, and even now states their determination to kill on a massive scale.
They have affiliates in many countries, to try to expand their reach.
These are not opinions to be debated. These are facts to be dealt with.
And how did “Al-Qaeeda” cause this WTC explosion?
And, by the verdict of your own logic of 3000 innocent victims killed by “Al-Qaeeda” on 9/11, what of the several million INNOCENT CIVILIAN VICTIMS barbarically murdered by the United States in Afghanistan and Iraq in retaliation for 9/11?
.“We have shot an amazing number of people, but to my knowledge, none has ever proven to be a threat, — Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, New York Times, March 26, 2010
.“all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets. — Voltaire, Welcome Letter
Until of course, Victor’s Justice catches up to the “apostles of death and hate”
.“ – we are not prepared to lay down a rule of criminal conduct against others which we would not be willing to have invoked against us. —U.S. Justice Robert H. Jackson, formulating the finer points of law as moral absolutes for administering victor’s justice at Nuremberg, Minutes of Conference Session of July 23, 1945, International Conference on Military Trials : London, 1945
.“ – the only conceivable end for these merchants of aggression, and as they plunged the world into a blood bath, it is fitting that they take their final plunge in ignominy! — Universal Newsreels: 21 Nazi Chiefs Guilty, Nuremberg Trials 1946/10/8
But until then, 2 + 2 is always 5 whenever OCEANIA is at perpetual war with the dark murdering armies of EURASIA – watch modernity scripted in George Orwell’s movie “1984” below
.“To those who would paralyze our Government in the face of impending threat by encasing it in a semantic strait-jacket, we must reply that all concepts are relative. — Justice Vinson, U.S. Supreme Court, 1951, re-formulating the finer points of law in Newspeak, Justice in the Service of Empire
.“Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities —Voltaire, The Enduring Power of Machiavellian Political Science
And as the sighted can already see, like the “Big Brother” of OCEANIA, the rulers of United States of America using their own Newspeak and the savagery of fabricated wars against “barbarians”, transformed their own nation into a Police State while its indoctrinated masses, its pathetic “House Negroes” and immigrant “Uncle Toms”, insanely cheered “United We Stand” against Islamofascism.
Of course, also only the sighted will ever see that from President George W. Bush to President Barrack Obama — More faces changed, more they remained the same!
.“The system is not only broken, it was crippled at birth – for it is so easily hijackable – from Wounded Knee to Iran, with new “Pearl Harbors” cleverly used for “imperial mobilization” from the USS Maine to 911 to the new nookular ’911′ that President Bush keeps warning the Americans and the world about in these ominous words as late as February 13, 2008: “Good morning [America]. At this moment, somewhere in the world, terrorists are planning new attacks on our country. Their goal is to bring destruction to our shores that will make September the 11th pale by comparison.” It is one continuous predatory imperative, from the Truman Doctrine, to the Carter Doctrine, to the Reagan Doctrine, and now to the Bush Doctrine. What did impeachment of Richard Nixon ever accomplish or deter, never mind restore to America’s millions of untold and unaccounted victims in Asia and South America? — How to derail “imperial mobilization” and preempt the crossing of the Nuclear Rubicon
.“What is the point of this analysis and all this verbage? The point is a matter of life and death for nations. That is the point of this. Let me be very precise. Either the United States, or Israel, are poised to attack Iran, as noted by many commentators in the World press,… This is March 2007. I have two imperatives before me: A) I do not wish to hear in 2010 that there was an “intelligence failure”, that it was another Gulf of Tonkin, or some other new contrivance from the imaginative and fertile mind of the hectoring hegemons. — Dialog Among Civilizations – Whytalksfail When the Hectoring Hegemons Are Running It And What To Do About It
Since the doctrines of aggression variously couched in Newspeak have remained the same despite the changing presidential faces in the White House, the AMERICAN PUBLIC’S REALPOLITIK to bravely extract their nation from the jaws of Big Brother’s Fourth Reich also remains the same:
1) Firstly, anything, including all ‘nuclear terrorist acts’ on American soil, or anywhere in the world, all shocking revelations by whistleblowers, all leaks in newspapers, and all phantasmal mantras that distract from the afore-stated goal, regardless of how compelling the reasons, must be treated by the unwary and gullible American public and its intellectual dissenting-chiefs, as red herrings, pretexts, and deceptions for premeditated “imperial mobilization” by their nation’s rulers.
2) Secondly, if there is reason for the United States to nuclear decimate any country or any peoples in purported ‘self-defense’, the American peoples must demand a ratification of the decision to go to war through a public referendum – let its great “populist democracy” speak directly in the modernity of the 21st century before it is called upon to make its sacrifices, before it is called upon to pay its taxes to fund the war, and before it is called upon to acquire innocent blood on its hands!
3) Thirdly, draw the soldiers, officers and war-technicians from the pool who vote for war! If they can vote yes to invade other nations and wantonly shatter the tabula rasa of a ‘lesser humanity’, then they must also first be willing to sign up for doing it themselves – instead of having a draft of economic conscription. Every ‘yes’ voting home in America must have at least one ‘patriot’ from the immediate family show up on the front-lines without exception – or their ‘yes’ vote is void!
Source URL: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2010/09/911-imperial-mobilization-redux.html
Alternate Source URL: http://bloghumanbeingsfirst.wordpress.com/2010/09/16/911-and-imperial-mobilization-redux-by-zahir-ebrahim/
Source 9/11 HOT Topics URL: http://humanbeingsfirst.wordpress.com/hot/
Also see: Circulation Request Letter
911 and Imperial Mobilization Redux By Zahir Ebrahim
(as in Operation Gladio in Western Europe during the Cold War to keep the fear of Communism alive)
First Watch Operation Gladio part1 , part2 , part3
Top Secret: There may be times when host country governments show passivity or indecision in the face of Communist subversion … US Army Intelligence must have the means of launching special operations which will convince host country governments and public opinion of the reality of the insurgent danger … US Army Intelligence should seek to penetrate the insurgency by means of agents of special assignments, with the task of forming special action groups among the most radical elements of the insurgency. — “I never heard such a thing” William Colby, Director of CIA 1973-1976
Here are some straightforward definitions
War on Terror: ‘Might defines right’ leads to “Hegemony is as old as mankind”, which in turn leads to If we don’t have real enemies then we have to create or imagine some, and in either case yell ‘we are being attacked’ in order to a) justify “imperial mobilization” and all its barbarianism upon the “terrorists”; and b) motivate an unwilling peoples into sacrificing for the agendas of achieving world government in the pretext of fighting terrorists in a perpetual Global War on Terror. To understand this visually, watchhow Oceania is in perpetual war with the murdering barbarian armies of Eurasia, and comparewith George W. Bush ushering in the perpetual war with “either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists”.
So, how to do this in perpetuity in order to maintain police-state in perpetuity? Because, “World government could only be kept in being by force.”!
Insurgency and counter Insurgency:The American agenda for Pakistan is not a state-secret. Rather, it is only thinly disguised as perpetually fighting the “insurgents” in a lifetime of war, the World War IV. [4] Whereas, in reality, both the “insurgency”, and the “counter-insurgency”, are entirely designed and fabricated in the USA as part of the evolving tactics of Hegelian Dialectics. They are enacted on the ground by various two-bit errand boys and expert trigger pullers. The already well-known existence of black-ops assassination squads in Pakistan/Afghanistan, known to the local peoples for years as the real prime-movers behind the heinous local terrorist acts, belatedly confirmed by NYT, WP, and NYT, in August 2009. [5] See these two December 2008 reports on the Mumbai terrorist Act as reportedly orchestrated by ALI BABA from his perch in the Hindu Kush. [6] The arrival of the black-ops in the region is not recent, albeit the public disclosures might be.
Out of uniform and In-uniform forces:To put this ominous presence of soldiers of freedom and fortune on Pakistani soil in full black-ops context of NATO and the Western Alliance, of diabolically manufacturing and sustaining the very pretexts out of uniform tickling insurgency to enable the in-uniform forces to pursue counter-insurgency in the perpetual mission of fighting World War IV, it is sufficient to look at what is transpiring in IRAQ for lessons to wisely apply to one’s own predicament in order to avoid a far worse one. Excerpted from The Decapitation of Pakistan by its own Military.
But when you ask about this today of any among the “Massa” and their plentiful “House Negroes” around the world, like William Colby quoted above in the context of Operation Gladio of yesteryear, all only incestuously reinforce the white man’s theme song of 9/11, that “Islamofascism” of Osama Bin Laden and the Talibans/Al-Qaeeda is the enemy.
The House Negroes further rush to clarify the distinction between “good Muslim” and “bad Muslim” ostensibly to distance themselves from the “enemy’, but in actuality only lending further credence to the existence of the enemy and its threat in full service to the “Massa”. The Hegelian Dialectic Militant Islam vs. Moderate Islam will surely go down in history as among the greatest enablers of war and manufactured consent, rivaling and perhaps surpassing both Communism vs. Fascism and Communism vs. Capitalism of the twentieth century. It is their legatee for the twenty-first century. It is already called “World War IV” (see Ex-CIA director: U.S. faces ‘World War IV’).
This is all what you hear on all media sources as consent is continually engineered for sustaining “imperial mobilization”. That’s principally all there is to it.
The rest is merely the narrations of the 1001 puppet-shows built on this core-lie. Its narrators are all murderers – their hands are as soaked in blood as those who press the triggers – but only the victor’s justice can ever prove that in court.
As Hitler had observed at the peak of his own hubris: “The victor will not be asked afterward whether he told the truth or not. In starting and waging a war it is not the right that matters, but victory.”
For ordinary people to see all this truism only requires that they overthrow their own self-interests as the House Negroes of Empire. The ubiquitous indoctrinating mantras are only as potent as people’s own self-interests in believing what they are told. If not for self-interest, Realityspeak trivially nullifies Newspeak. All human beings are capable of thought. Try it.
But not all are capable of giving up their self-interests.
When self-interest trumps morality, in Dante’s colorful rendition: “the hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in a period of moral crisis, maintain their neutrality.”
All you pious peoples better believe it!
Zahir Ebrahim
What is War on Terror? By Zahir Ebrahim
“either you are with us, or you are with the [super] terrorists”
‘In the summer of 2005, the commission of the European parliament for security and defense, of which I am a member, was invited to a special screening created by the Washington Center for Strategic [and International] Studies
(Slide: CSIS Debating 21st Century Nuclear Issues, Edited by Owen C. W. Price and Jenifer Mackby, subtitled Black-Dawn: Scenario-Based Exercise, dated: May 3 2004)
We were asked to watch a film which depicted what would happen in Europe, if Brussels was hit by a nuclear bomb.
Fifty thousand deaths, hundred thousand injured. The reactions of various European governments.
Suddenly, footage of Osama Bin Laden claiming responsibility for a nuclear attack on NATO headquarters comes on screen.
All members of the parliament, myself included, were rendered speechless.
American experts from the Center for Strategic Studies, were on hand to explain the action on the screen.
Then a parliamentarian finally said: “Today we were shown a convincing demonstration of how Osama Bin Laden’s image can be completely manipulated. All the Osama’s we have seen over the years, may never have existed. Just as a nuclear attack on NATO Headquarters in Brussels has never taken place.”’
What’s next after Osama Bin Laden?
“either you are with us, or you are with the [super] terrorists”
Make up your own damn mind!
