Category Archives: Technique of Infamy

The Hegelian Dialectics of Deception

The Hegelian Dialectics of Deception

Today’s Focus: Anatomy of Modern Lies, Senseless Warfare, Merchants of Death – Educate Yourself

The Merchants of Death and their Errand Boys and Girls

 

“I am aware that there is still some who would question, or even justify the offense of 911.

But let us be clear. Al Qaeeda killed nearly 3000 people on that day. The victims were innocent men, women, and children from America and many other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody.

And yet Al Qaeeda chose to ruthlessly murder these people, claimed credit for the attack, and even now states their determination to kill on a massive scale.

They have affiliates in many countries, to try to expand their reach.

These are not opinions to be debated. These are facts to be dealt with.”

‘Public Assumptions’ Shape Views of History: “Such presumptions are beliefs (1) thought to be true (although not necessarily known to be true with certainty), and (2) shared in common within the relevant political community. The sources for such presumptions are both personal (from direct experience) and vicarious (from books, movies, and myths).”

A video of initiation of explosive destruction is here for WTC 1 (North Tower) and here for WTC 2 (South Tower).

And here for the sudden free-fall symmetrical collapse of WTC 7 that same day at which Dan Rather of CBS spontaneously exclaimed on air: “… amazing, incredible, pick your word. For the third time today, it’s reminiscent of those pictures we have all seen too much on television before when a building was deliberately destroyed by well-placed dynamite to knock it down,” and which the BBC, in surely what must be the most surreal moment in live news reporting history, announced many minutes before it even happened!

And here is a flashback of the smoke-and-mirrors “prior-knowledge” dialectical red herring in greater exposition of the ‘technique of infamy’:

 

And lastly, here is an April 2008 snapshot of FBI’s most wanted poster of Osama Bin Laden. Despite the familiar face being indelibly etched on America’s imagination as the mastermind of 911, seven years into the world transforming event, FBI still did not seem to think that the man on the dialysis machine hiding in a cave in the Hindu Kush perpetrated the “new Pearl Harbor”.

“These are not opinions to be debated. These are facts to be dealt with.”!!

Indeed Mr. President of the United States of America, had these facts not already irreversibly seeded the pre-planned, premeditated fait accompli for “Our Global Neighborhood” (online) (cached pdf) in one-world government in the perfect mold of Hegelian Dialectics! The globalists’ phoenix of the un-publicly sanctioned World Order to be raised from the ashes of the criminally decimated old world order of sovereign nation-states, is the real fact to be dealt with. So debates on 911 make great red herrings – I would quite agree with you there Mr. President.

This preliminary status report and the Council on Foreign Relations’ Global Governance Monitor make that irrefutably clear, as does the United States Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, while speaking at the CFR in July 2009, and so does the Council’s current President Richard N. Haas. And these are merely the echoes of implementation reverberations in a successor generation, of the CFR’s Richard N. Gardner’s April 1974 words in Foreign Affairs which blatantly stated: “house of world order’ [is to] be built from the bottom up, rather than from the top down, [to make it] look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’, [in order to force] an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece [to] accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.” The latter was itself merely a re-echo of the bankster-founder of CFR and principal architect of the Federal Reserve System, Paul Warburg’s aspirations as menacingly echoed by his son, James Warburg, in 1950 to the US Senate: “We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” And were those elitist words, perceptively uttered more than half-century ago in the hallowed halls of governance of a majestic superpower to its elected officials presumably representing the WILL of its peoples, themselves very original? How far back does it go? And here is a who’s who of CFR (dated, circa President Clinton era). How many do you think have repeatedly echoed that same agenda without being overly secretive about it? If one believes the banksters’ own prolific and legendary historian Professor Carroll Quigley – who was also President Bill Clinton’s mentor at Georgetown University’s prestigious School of Foreign Service – it is a long running very-deep open conspiracy. Here is the ‘Cliff Notes’ version. How many, one surely wonders, among all those elite across multiple generations, sought the mandate from the people, minimally of the United States – the beacon of Democracy – if not the rest of the ‘untermenschen’ world, for that private global agenda instead of diabolically sowing “an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece” in baby-step faits accomplis?

And that “end run around national sovereignty” agenda, once all the syntactic sugaring is wiped away from fancy words like “Global Governance”, is nothing but a centrally planned, centrally managed, and centrally controlled neo-liberal global earth-super-state. In other words, the dream of Karl Marx: world communism! And the uber capitalists are its key harbingers!

They did it so simply too: Free Trade! Possibly the best Trojan Horse since time immemorial! All empires have been built on the mantra of free trade since antiquity. The only difference from the former USSR in its new dispensation of empire being that the new ruling oligarchy is the fraternity of capitalist International banksters coming together in a new world central bank, instead of in the old fashioned Politburo. In order to maintain facades, and for efficacy of management, each local “state” may continue to fly their own patriotic flag, and continue to administer their people within their own jurisdiction as in the Roman to Ottoman empires, but that’s all they will do. See this scribe’s Editorial of November 24, 2007 The Re-Gathering Storm. And Richard N. Haas in “Sovereignty and Globalization” effectively said the same thing “The goal should be to redefine sovereignty for the era of globalisation, to find a balance between a world of fully sovereign states and an international system of either world government or anarchy.” That’s the balance – separate flags. But one global currency, one global law, one global military force, one global central bank, one global monetary system, one global production planning via the architecture of carbon-credits, etc. There is plenty of evidence all around as documented by Project Humanbeingsfirst in its Monthly Financial and State Terrorism Reports, but only if one wishes to see it. See for instance the Letter to Editor: “Understanding the Political Science behind Global Warming”, February 07, 2009, by this scribe which looks at how carbon credit is intended to be used for both global production planning, as well as the more ominous global population planning and reduction. The column in Russia’s Pravda “American capitalism gone with a whimper” by Stanislav Mishin is quite revealing too in its mocking of America for its rapid embrace of Marxist socialism and the blatant idiocy of the American goy: “The proud American will go down into his slavery with out a fight, beating his chest and proclaiming to the world, how free he really is.” And so is this old video interview of KGB defector Yuri Bezmenov by G. Edward Griffin. Listen to Bezmenov’s very last sentence in response to the interviewer’s question of what can be done: “force United States Government to stop aiding communism.” That is virtually identical disclosure to the statements made by the US Congressional Investigator Norman Dodd to G. Edward Griffin, excerpted below in some detail. As noted in the Editorial of October 19, 2009 by this scribe, the greatest and longest-running enemy of humankind is not in some far away corner of the world, but right here at home.

To realize that long standing global plan, or conspiracy to be more precise, these un-elected private financiers still are, just as they have been all along, setting the tactical and strategic agendas for the ‘errand boys’ in the White House as even candidly affirmed by the latest generation to do so, Ms. Hillary Clinton, in the video below. Listen carefully to Richard Haas’ words as he introduces Hillary Clinton and strip them down to their real essence. The Nobel Peace Prize Committee too has unequivocally acknowledged this masterfully executed fait accompli of World Order by gratuitously granting President Obama the covetous “Peace Maker” moniker. This Public Relations design calculatingly helps reinforce the public myths of a ‘savior‘ in exactly the same way as many a superlative marketing campaign synthesized the ‘change‘ myth in order to rally the masses and their shepherds – with or without illusions – behind the new face.

The unfathomable power of Political Science – which remains un-divorced from the Biblical Cain since time immemorial – the waging of relentless war by way of deception upon the public mind, the Hegelian Dialectics, the technique of infamy, the “end run around”, the “eroding it piece by piece” instead of the “old-fashioned frontal assault”, trumping all others. Watch how it’s done:

CFR - A Conversation with U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton July 15, 2009  Also at http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid1857622883?bctid=29636586001

 

 

 

“… the son of David, who purified Jerusalem from the nations that trampled her down. Destroy the lawless nations and gather a holy people whom you will lead in righteousness.”

“… the dream to control the entire world under one ruler by disarming the nations of the world. … It was a plan to divide and conquer the nations of the world, by provoking wars, then profiting from war loans, and from the sale of weapons to both sides. Exhausted by war, terror, and chaos, humanity would eventually bow down to one world ruler, and one world army as a solution! … It was a plan to control public opinion by purchasing the controlling shares in tv networks, newspapers, publishing houses, and film studios.”

 

And the Pakistani Negroes dutifully play their master’s tune.

[ For analysis see: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2009/05/newsflash-terrorism-may2009.html or just watch these videos and you can figure it out yourself – it ain’t rocket science, only political science! ]

Resurgence of the Taliban in Pakistan Hamid MirCommonwealth Club

 

 

 

A Conversation with Benazir Bhutto (Video), Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), August 15, 2007, Full-Length

 

‘“In the summer of 2005, the commission of the European parliament for security and defense, of which I am a member, was invited to a special screening created by the Washington Center for Strategic [and International] Studies”

(Slide: CSIS Debating 21st Century Nuclear Issues, Edited by Owen C. W. Price and Jenifer Mackby, subtitled Black-Dawn: Scenario-Based Exercise, dated: May 3 2004)

“We were asked to watch a film which depicted what would happen in Europe, if Brussels was hit by a nuclear bomb.”

“Fifty thousand deaths, hundred thousand injured. The reactions of various European governments.”

“Suddenly, footage of Osama Bin Laden claiming responsibility for a nuclear attack on NATO headquarters comes on screen.”

“All members of the parliament, myself included, were rendered speechless.”

“American experts from the Center for Strategic Studies, were on hand to explain the action on the screen.”

“Then a parliamentarian finally said: Today we were shown a convincing demonstration of how Osama Bin Laden’s image can be completely manipulated. All the Osama’s we have seen over the years, may never have existed. Just as a nuclear attack on NATO Headquarters in Brussels has never taken place.” ‘

Un-surprisingly, Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski, the man behind President Obama, the architect of ‘the Grand Chessboard‘ and the Executive Director of the Trilateral Commission, the one who gave to the “USSR its Vietnam War” by manufacturing Osama Bin Laden, is also the Counselor and Trustee of CSIS ( cached here ).

The real unhidden agenda behind all this perpetual war-mongering is actually rather banal, as outlined in the “Report From Iron Mountain: On the Possibility and Desirability of Peace” published in 1967 (a fictionalized rendering of oligarchic modus operandi, not unlike Philip Dru: Administrator – A Story of Tomorrow, or the amoral political science buried in The Protocols and Machiavelli). Its seedlings were discovered in the 1908-09 minute books of the Carnegie Endowment for Peace in 1953-54 by the indefatigable Congressional Investigator Norman Dodd for the Reece Committee investigating the suspected subversion by tax-exempt foundations. Norman Dodd rehearsed the occurrence of the following question from the minute books:

 

‘We are now at the year 1908, which was the year that the Carnegie Foundation began operations. In that year, the trustees, meeting for the first time, raised a specific question, which they discussed throughout the balance of the year in a very learned fashion.

The question is: “Is there any means known more effective than war, assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire people?”

And they conclude that no more effective means than war to that end is known to humanity.

So then, in 1909, they raised the second question and discussed it, namely: “How do we involve the United States in a war?”

Well, I doubt at that time if there was any subject more removed from the thinking of most of the people of this country than its involvement in a war. There were intermittent shows in the Balkans, but I doubt very much if many people even knew where the Balkans were.

Then, finally, they answered that question as follows: “We must control the State Department.” That very naturally raises the question of how do we do that? And they answer it by saying: “We must take over and control the diplomatic machinery of this country.” And, finally, they resolve to aim at that as an objective.

Then time passes, and we are eventually in a war, which would be World War I. At that time they record on their minutes a shocking report in which they dispatched to President Wilson a telegram, cautioning him to see that the war does not end too quickly.’

Mr. Norman Dodd further related of a conversation he had with the President of the tax-exempt Ford Foundation in 1954, as part of his Congressionally mandated investigation of tax-exempt foundations:

NORMON DODD: “Mr. Dodd, we’ve asked you to come up here today because we thought that possibly, off the record, you would tell us why the Congress is interested in the activities of the foundations such as ourselves.” Before I could think of how I would reply to that statement, Mr. Gaither then went on and said: “Mr. Dodd, all of us who have a hand in the making of policies here have had experience operating under directives, the substance of which is that we shall use our grant-making power so to alter life in the United States that it can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.”

ED GRIFFIN: Why do the foundations generously support Communist causes in the United States?

NORMAN DODD: Well, because to them, Communism represents a means of developing what we call a monopoly, that is, an organization of, say, a large-scale industry into an administerable unit.

ED GRIFFIN: Do they think that they will be the ones to benefit?

NORMAN DODD: They will be the beneficiaries of it, yes.

The political science behind these apparently phantasmic disclosures is neither fantasy nor fiction. The prime-axiom of the necessity for warfare to keep order in society (as well as to orchestrate change because “what is inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times”), was even palpably argued by philosopher Bertrand Russell in “Impact of Science on Society”. In fact, Bertrand Russell sarcastically lamented that the desired goal of the elimination of nation-states to create one-world government would also eliminate a primal cause célèbre for jingoistic patriotism, i.e., nationalism, which has hitherto trivially enabled ‘United We Stand’ and therefore, the prophetic scholar plausibly argued, “World government could only be kept in being by force.”

The same foundational principles of conquest are operational today as further demonstrated by Zbigniew Brzezinski in ‘the Grand Chessboard‘ where he equally amorally argued the rationale for “American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives” with the apparent truism “Hegemony is as old as mankind.” Of which of course, he is also the policy planner. The only difference today is that the ecclesiastical controls by the oligarchy of the yore (who could straightforwardly count on god and the spirit of ‘la mission civilisatrice’), have been substituted with far more sophisticated mind control by the oligarchy of modernity, to continue shepherding the masses ‘United We Stand’.

All of which leads us to the Anatomy of Modern Lies – the Hegelian Dialectics of Deception – the Technique of Infamy being employed by both the masters and their Negro slaves:

  • Invent not one, but two (or more) opposing lies, and keep the unsuspecting people busy debating which of them is true. (The ‘Technique of Infamy’, exposition attributed to Ezra Pound)
  • From the clash of opposite constructions, a greater whole is germinated towards the desired outcome (The Hegelian Dialectics)
  • When the opposites don’t exist or don’t clash naturally, it is fabricated and the clash engineered, entirely stage-managed on both sides to piece-meal synthesize the desired hidden agenda – raising a new phoenix from the ashes left behind by the controlled clash of the opposites (The Hegelian Dialectics of Deception applied to modern statecraft, familiar to most as fake-competition to reel in customers, or fake-managed-fights as in WWF wrestling benefiting its owners regardless of who wins or loses)

The public relations of the stage-management of this manufactured conflict on a global scale to make it appear genuine and inevitable like World War I, World War II, World War III, and now World War IV – all unnatural and synthesized orchestrations leaving behind only wreckages of civilizations, and thus the opportunity of systematically and incrementally upbuilding the desired one – falls to the Mighty Wurlitzer. Its job is to keep people’s attention distracted on the deadly puppetshows and dazzling imagery in the left-field while the even more monstrous agendas are accomplished in the right-field. All one has to do to catch sight of the real game, is to slightly turn one’s head! A blunder which Benazir Bhutto made of not looking ‘tous-azimuth’ when she was fully capable of such a modest movement (see The Nation, May 18, 2009).

A gentle turning of the head like this courageous Young Turk is attempting to do – but inevitably also being held back by the same invisible-power to only acutely naming “the shadows of the images”:

 

The slight turning of the head that is so cleverly straight-jacketed by the psy-ops of the Mighty Wurlitzer as ‘conspiracy theories‘ and ‘manufactured dissent‘.

That modest head-turning, ‘tous azimuth’, is the sole purpose of Project Humanbeingsfirst. The reality of President Obama’s real game being played out in the right-field is here. The reality of Pakistan’s democracy in the right-field, which Mr. Hamid Mir of Geo TV forgot to narrate in his otherwise exuberant descriptions of “Ali Baba” in the left-field before his spellbound American audience at the Commonwealth Club of California, is here. The best short summary of understanding the overarching hidden agenda for which all the ‘Hegelian Dialectics of Deception’ have been fabricated, is this Response to Financial Times Gideon Rachman’s ‘And now for a world government’.

Epilogue:

What is not already obvious here” – except of course to the glorified ‘goatherders’ of modernity repeatedly being made either a fool or co-opted to service the globalists’ agenda? Yes with fancy degrees, ‘English speaking’, high-IQ, and all! So if plebeians can’t think – are they any better than goats being herded on a preserve? Except for the handful of vegans among us, does anyone ever feel remorse when slaughtering a sheep or goat as a utility?

Those unable to think are no more than goats before the ruling-elite, to be entirely managed as a utility by their hand-picked goatherders. A trained sheepdog is all it takes to herd millions to their pre-ordained destiny. Today, that sheepdog is merely black in its exterior color – but has the same white teeth.

After years of activism and education since 911, initially having taken up the two-humble feet in protest marches before the invasion of Iraq in 2003, and upon its failure to stop the war, the supposedly mighty pen beginning with ‘Prisoners of the Cave‘ against the amoral butchers of modernity who perceive themselves as being ‘beyond good and evil’, Project Humanbeingsfirst is ending its silly mission. For, attempting to educate the goats of the butchers’ intent was eminently an idiotic idea to begin with. The last straw has been Pakistan. It’s own people, its military, its rulers, cheerleading their own destruction against a superbly orchestrated phantom menace which apparently requires extraordinary thinking-skills to comprehend. A talent we the goats of humanity evidently haven’t been endowed with in our DNA-makeup to the right measure as compared to the Overlords who rule upon us.

For the ‘ubermenschen’ of modernity, as of antiquity, might is right is the only sacred reality. The hectoring hegemons respect only power, and are perniciously circumspect only of balance of power which they themselves euphemistically call the ‘balance of terror‘, akin to ‘two scorpions in a bottle‘. Their sophisticated thinking entails only exigencies of conquest and invoking primacy by any means. End justifies all means for them. They remain imbibed with the existential reality in which they are formed and sip from, of ‘hegemony is as old as mankind’. If there is a creator of the Cro-Magnon, that architect is surely a most cruel inventor, that its ‘best of creation‘, the ‘inheritors of the earth’, amply endowed with pious literature preaching not to sip from the devil’s cup, predictably turned out to be mindless goats and mercenary goatherders focused mainly on chewing their processed feeds, and entirely fashioned to serve their ‘ubermensch’ masters. These inhuman Overlords, blessed both with power and the amoral ambition to wield it, connivingly endeavor to OWN both the goats and the goatherders in every NWO since time immemorial. And indeed, apparently, always succeed. Perhaps the god’s favored ones are a different species altogether. Goats are no more a match for them than minnows realistically are for sharks. The much touted dissenting pen of democracy, without concomitant power structures propping it, least of all.

Caveat Emptor:

Unless one has principally come to this tutorial with a keen desire to learn, rather than with an a priori agenda to refute, one has simply wasted one’s time. After going through this tutorial, unless one has acquired some appreciation for concepts like: what does collateral damage to language, and consequently to thought, looks like; how can words be Machiavellianly re-semanticized for the public mind; how public myths are constructed, and subsequently harvested; and most importantly, how one can be made to love one’s own servitude to the extent of even apologizing for it like the ‘Good German’, one could not have possibly understood a thing that is being taught here and thus again wasted one’s time. In order to benefit oneself, do read Modernity Simplified. Be skeptical; be not among the “crowd of the simpletons and the credulous”, nor become the “Second” type in Hitler’s classification of people, and nor remain the “First”; but emerge as the “Third”. See Mein Kampf vol. 1, chapter X, or read its excerpt in the preamble pages 2-3 here. That skepticism is expected even during this tutorial.

Caveat Lector:

Because we have used these sources, it does not mean we accept all details of information in them. It also does not mean that we either endorse them when we are in agreement, or censure them when we are not. As G. Edward Griffin says: “If we took information only from sources with which we agreed on all issues, we would be left with merely quoting ourselves, and we would miss a great deal of truth.”

- ### -

Email a friend an invitation to learn modernity from this engaging self study

This Project Humanbeingsfirst tutorial is partially excerpted from the DIGEST of Financial and State Terrorism May 2009: The Final Waging Global War By Way of Deception Report

Source URL: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2009/05/anatomy-of-modern-lies-pakistanishills.html

Mirror URL: http://humanbeingsfirst.wordpress.com/2009/10/22/hegelian-dialectics-of-deception/


Last Updated: 10/22/09 06:00 pm 4038